Gilmore-Bey v. Schneider
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
NINTU XI GILMORE-BEY, Case No. 24-cv-10689 Plaintiff, Honorable Robert J. White Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford v.
DEBORAH M. SCHNEIDER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER TO CONFIRM MAILING ADDRESS
On April 2, 2025, the Court received notice that its March 14, 2025, order mailed to Plaintiff Nintu Xi Gilmore-Bey was returned as undeliverable, as the address was vacant. ECF No. 91. Gilmore-Bey was notified of her obligation to notify the Court of an address change. ECF No. 4. By April 11, 2025, Gilmore-Bey must file written notice confirming her mailing address. Failure to comply may result in a recommendation to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute. E.D. Mich. LR 11.2; Yeschick v. Mineta, 675 F.3d 622, 630 (6th Cir. 2012). s/Elizabeth A. Stafford ELIZABETH A. STAFFORD United States Magistrate Judge Dated: April 4, 2025 NOTICE TO PARTIES ABOUT OBJECTIONS
Within 14 days of being served with this order, any party may file objections with the assigned district judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The district judge may sustain an objection only if the order is clearly erroneous
or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 636. “When an objection is filed to a magistrate judge’s ruling on a non-dispositive motion, the ruling remains in full force and effect unless and until it is stayed by the magistrate judge or a district judge.” E.D. Mich. LR 72.2.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that this document was served on counsel of record and any unrepresented parties via the Court’s ECF System to their email or First-Class U.S. mail addresses disclosed on the Notice of Electronic Filing on April 4, 2025.
s/Davon Allen DAVON ALLEN Case Manager
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilmore-Bey v. Schneider (Gilmore-Bey v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.