Gilmer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Gilmer v. State

1926 OK CR 257, 246 P. 1118, 34 Okla. Crim. 372, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 2, 1926·No. No. A-5600.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, R. G. Gilmer, was convicted on a charge of vagrancy, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 *373 and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment he appeals, but no brief has been filed, and the cause was submitted on the record. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Finding no prejudicial error, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, R. G. Gilmer, was convicted on a charge of vagrancy, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury was sentenced to pay a fine of $100 *373 and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days. From the judgment he appeals, but no brief has been filed, and the cause was submitted on the record. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Finding no prejudicial error, the judgment is affirmed.

Gilmer v. State, 1926 OK CR 257, 246 P. 1118, 34 Okla. Crim. 372, 1926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 251 (Okla. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

1926 OK CR 257 (Gilmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.