Gilmer v. Franklin Park Improvement Co.
This text of 170 N.C. 452 (Gilmer v. Franklin Park Improvement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was fully and ably argued by counsel on both sides, wbo also filed very elaborate briefs, stowing their interest in the cause and the study which they had given it. But upon consideration of the whole case we do not find any error.
The first issue was purely as to a matter of fact, and, there being evidence' to support the plaintiffs’ contention, the verdict, undisturbed by the judge, is conclusive. It follows that, as to the second issue, $1,750 was the correct amount of the damage.
The judge was also correct as to his ruling that under the statute of frauds, Rev., 974, the guarantee of Robinson, if made, was oral, and therefore could not be enforced.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 N.C. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilmer-v-franklin-park-improvement-co-nc-1915.