Gilmer v. Cameron

1 Georgia Decisions 142

Opinion

The Court, in this case, as in all others, endeavored to charge the Jury as to the Law applicable to the case, and it was the peculiar province of the Jury to find the facts and make an application of the Law to the facts, and as the Court did not charge the Jury what their finding should be, I can not say that the finding was contrary to the charge of the Court.

It is therefore ordered, that the motion for a new trial be refused, and the verdict affirmed,

WILLIAM' EZZARD, j, s. c. c. c,