Gilman v. United States

294 F. 422, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2951
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 8, 1924·No. No. 3070·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

First indicating that no question of the jurisdiction of the District Court under the Tucker Act (24 Stat. 505) has been raised or decided, we affirm the judgment of that court on the opinion of the learned trial judge (290 Fed. 614), later fortified by the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Helmholz v. Horst, 294 Fed. 417, affirming Horst v. United States (D. C.) 283 Fed. 600.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilman v. United States, 294 F. 422, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2951 (3d Cir. 1924).

294 F. 422 (Gilman v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newborn v. De Witt
51 S.W.2d 478 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1932)
National Union Bank v. McNeal
145 S.E. 549 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1928)
In Re Estate of Pivonka
211 N.W. 246 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)
White v. United States
270 U.S. 175 (Supreme Court, 1926)