Gilman v. Toll
This text of Gilman v. Toll (Gilman v. Toll) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
LANCE GILMAN, No. 81726 Appellant/Cross-Respondent, vs. SAM TOLL, Res • ondent/Cross-A ellant. LANCE CrILMAN, No. 81874 Appellant/Cross-Respondent, vs. SAM TOLL, FILED Respondent/Cross-Ai i ellant. JAN 0 7 2022 ELIZABETH & BROWN CLERK Of BY ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, the appeal in Docket No. 81726 is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). The stipulation also purports to dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 81874. The appeal in Docket No. 81874 was dismissed on May 20, 2021. This court therefore takes no action on the stipulation to the extent it purports to dismiss the appeal in Docket No. 81874. It is so ORDERED.
o cc: Hon. James E. Wilson, District Judge David Wasick, Settlement Judge Gunderson Law Firm Flangas Dalacas Law Group, Inc. John L. Marshall Luke A. Busby Storey County Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947n cfgbr4 2 A 5,op
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gilman v. Toll, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilman-v-toll-nev-2022.