Gilman v. Gilman

263 A.D.2d 496, 691 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8104
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 19, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 A.D.2d 496 (Gilman v. Gilman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilman v. Gilman, 263 A.D.2d 496, 691 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment entered July 8, 1997, the mother appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Ponterio, J.), dated June 5, 1998, which granted the father’s motion for extended unsupervised visitation with the parties’ child.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

It is well settled that in adjudicating visitation rights, the court must base its determination upon the best interests of the child (see, Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 95-[497]*49796). Since the determination of the Supreme Court is supported by the record, it will not be disturbed on appeal (see, Koppenhoefer v Koppenhoefer, 159 AD2d 113). We note that if there is any change of circumstances, an appropriate application may be made by the mother.

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J. P., Santucci, Schmidt and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chaya S. v. Frederick Herbert L.
284 A.D.2d 335 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 A.D.2d 496, 691 N.Y.S.2d 924, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilman-v-gilman-nyappdiv-1999.