Gilman v. Bartlett

Superior Court of New Hampshire

Gilman v. Bartlett

20 N.H. 168

DecidedJuly 15, 1849

StatusPublished

This text of 20 N.H. 168 (Gilman v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilman v. Bartlett, 20 N.H. 168 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1849).

Pincite

Opinion

Gilchrist, C. J.

The question arising in this case was considered by the court in Sanborn v. Pease, in the county of Rockingham; when it was held that by the terms of the Rev. Stat., ch. 175, sec. 7, requiring the appellant to enter into recognizance with “ sufficient sureties,” there must be more sureties than one. The appeal, therefore, not having been regularly granted, must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gilchrist, C. J.

The question arising in this case was considered by the court in Sanborn v. Pease, in the county of Rockingham; when it was held that by the terms of the Rev. Stat., ch. 175, sec. 7, requiring the appellant to enter into recognizance with “ sufficient sureties,” there must be more sureties than one. The appeal, therefore, not having been regularly granted, must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 N.H. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilman-v-bartlett-nhsuperct-1849.