GILMAN CIOCIA, INC. v. SCOTT E. AABEL

District Court of Appeal of Florida

GILMAN CIOCIA, INC. v. SCOTT E. AABEL

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 17, 2023

Docket21-3566

StatusPublished

This text of GILMAN CIOCIA, INC. v. SCOTT E. AABEL (GILMAN CIOCIA, INC. v. SCOTT E. AABEL) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

GILMAN CIOCIA, INC. v. SCOTT E. AABEL, (Fla. Ct. App. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

GILMAN CIOCIA, INC., a Delaware corporation as successor-in-interest to PRIME CAPITAL SERVICES, INC. and ASSET & FINANCIAL PLANNING, LTD., NATIONAL SECURITIES CORPORATION, a Washington corporation, and NATIONAL ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC., a Washington corporation,

Appellants,

v.

SCOTT E. AABEL, GARY DIDONNA, JAMES PROTIGAL, and ANTONIO GOMES,

Appellees.

No. 2D21-3566

November 17, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Hunter W. Carroll, Judge.

Maureen B. Soles, Michael R. Levin, and Christa C. Turner of Baker & Hostetler, LLP, Orlando, for Appellants.

Worth S. Graham and W. Andrew Clayton, Jr. of Icard, Merril, Cullis, Timm, Furen & Ginsberg, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. KELLY, KHOUZAM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

__________________________

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI