Gillum v. Owens

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided January 30, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-01859·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 DAVID ALLEN GILLUM, 9 Plaintiff, CASE NO. C19-1859-RSM-BAT 10 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO ADD INFORMATION 11 OWENS, et al., 12 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights 14 action. By order dated January 7, 2020, the Court directed service of the complaint. Defendants 15 have not yet filed answers to the complaint. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to “Add 16 Information; Complaint, Parties, Damages.” Dkt. 13. Plaintiff’s motion lists various general 17 “rights”, “parties” and “damages” suffered but fails to articulate any facts or explain what 18 “party” violated what right or how the right was allegedly violated. Id. 19 Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. 13) is DENIED without prejudice because it is unclear what 20 relief plaintiff is seeking in his motion. Even if the Court were to construe plaintiff’s motion as 21 one seeking to file an amended complaint, plaintiff fails to provide sufficient information to state 22 a claim for relief. If plaintiff intends to file an amended complaint to include additional claims 23 and defendants he is advised that he must write out a short, plain statement telling the Court: (1) 1 the constitutional right plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name of the person who violated 2 the right; (3) exactly what that person did or failed to do; (4) how the action or inaction of that 3 person is connected to the violation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights; and (5) what specific 4 injury plaintiff suffered because of that person’s conduct. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362,

5 371–72 (1976). Plaintiff is also advised that if he files an amended complaint it will act as a 6 complete substitute for the original complaint and not as a supplement. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 7 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, the amended complaint must include all of 8 the claims plaintiff intends to include in this action. 9 The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff a copy of this order and the appropriate forms for 10 filing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. 11 DATED this 30th day of January, 2020. 12 A 13 BRIAN A. TSUCHIDA United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillum v. Owens, (W.D. Wash. 2020).

Gillum v. Owens (Gillum v. Owens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rizzo v. Goode
423 U.S. 362 (Supreme Court, 1976)
Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, Sheriff
963 F.2d 1258 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)