Gilloutet v. Marcelin
This text of 7 La. Ann. 442 (Gilloutet v. Marcelin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the court: (Slidell, 3., absent.)
In this case the clerk has certified that, with the exception of the writ of injunction, issued on the 9th of August, 1850, which has not been returned, and the record of the suit of Octave Anfoux v. Charles Gilloutet and Wm. B. Converse, No. 4695 of the docket of the Second District Court of New Orleans, offered in evidence by the defendant, a transcript of which has not been furnished, the record contains a coi’rect transcript of the proceedings, as well as all the documents filed, and all the testimony adduced on the trial.
This certificate is clearly insufficient; and, as a diminution of the record was not suggested at the proper time, and it contains no bill of exceptions or statement of facts, and no assignment of errors has been filed, the appeal must be dismissed.
It is ordered, that the appeal be dismissed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 La. Ann. 442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilloutet-v-marcelin-la-1852.