Gillooly v. Eljan Corp.
This text of 354 F.2d 658 (Gillooly v. Eljan Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
354 F.2d 658
Patricia GILLOOLY
v.
ELJAN CORP., a Corporation of New Jersey, Succasunna Realty
Corp., a Corporation of New Jersey, Eli Gaynor and
Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch
and Eli Gaynor and Janice
Gaynor, Individually.
Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and
Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually, Appellants.
No. 15375.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 13, 1965.
Decided Jan. 14, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey; Reynier J. Wortendyke, Jr., Judge.
Allan Maitlin, Newark, N.J. (Feuerstein & Sachs, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellants.
John A. Gleeson, Newark, N.J. (Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, Newark, N.J., George P. Lacay, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case was fairly tried and properly submitted to the jury. We have carefully examined all of appellants' points for appeal. There is no error of any substance in the trial record.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 F.2d 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillooly-v-eljan-corp-ca3-1966.