Gillman v. Sorventino

133 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 715, 17 Gummere 715, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 232
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gillman v. Sorventino. Read the opinion of the Court — 101 N.J.L. 447
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 17, 1926·Published

Opinion

*716 Pee Cubiam.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Mr. Justice Minturn.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillman v. Sorventino, 133 A. 919, 102 N.J.L. 715, 17 Gummere 715, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 232 (N.J. 1926).

133 A. 919 (Gillman v. Sorventino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.