Gillman v. Santiago
653 So. 2d 513, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4429, 1995 WL 238821
Opinion
We affirm the order granting the writ of prohibition. The court correctly concluded that the defendant was entitled to discharge under the speedy trial rule; the state impeded preparation of the defense by delays in providing defendant with requested discov[514]*514ery materials. Colby v. McNeill, 595 So.2d 115 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 604 So.2d 487 (Fla.1992); see State v. Del Gaudio, 445 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 453 So.2d 45 (Fla.1984).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gillman v. Santiago, 653 So. 2d 513, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4429, 1995 WL 238821 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
653 So. 2d 513 (Gillman v. Santiago) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Del Gaudio
445 So. 2d 605 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Colby v. McNeill
595 So. 2d 115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)