Gillman v. Goldberg
This text of 11 A.D.2d 795 (Gillman v. Goldberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a malpractice action, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 4, 1959, denying his motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of prosecution. Order affirmed, without costs. (See Queens County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, rule 9; cf. Grisafl v. Rubinstein, 8 A D 2d 742; Kings County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules, rule 9.) Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D.2d 795, 205 N.Y.S.2d 977, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillman-v-goldberg-nyappdiv-1960.