Gillis v. Dwyer

2019 NY Slip Op 390
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 22, 2019
Docket8167 21466/17E
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 390 (Gillis v. Dwyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gillis v. Dwyer, 2019 NY Slip Op 390 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Gillis v Dwyer (2019 NY Slip Op 00390)
Gillis v Dwyer
2019 NY Slip Op 00390
Decided on January 22, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 22, 2019
Sweeny, J.P., Richter, Tom, Kern, Singh, JJ.

8167 21466/17E

[*1]Andrew Gillis, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Timothy Dwyer, Defendant-Respondent.


Law Office of Michael H. Joseph, P.L.L.C., White Plains (Michael H. Joseph of counsel), for appellant.

O'Connor, McGuinness, Conte, Doyle, Olson, Watson & Loftus, LLP, White Plains (Montgomery L. Effinger of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Donald Miles, J.), entered April 2, 2018, which denied plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly denied in this action where plaintiff was allegedly injured while riding his bicycle. Plaintiff stated that defendant's vehicle made a sudden left turn into plaintiff's lane causing the collision. Defendant states that plaintiff's bicycle struck his stopped vehicle after he made a slow left turn into a driveway. The parties' conflicting versions as to how the accident occurred raise triable issues of fact (see e.g. Jarrett v Claro, 161 AD3d 639 [1st Dept 2018]; Ramos v Rojas, 37 AD3d 291, 292 [1st Dept 2007]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JANUARY 22, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ramos v. Rojas
37 A.D.3d 291 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillis-v-dwyer-nyappdiv-2019.