Gilliland, Joseph Wayne

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 25, 2015
DocketWR-81,473-01
StatusPublished

This text of Gilliland, Joseph Wayne (Gilliland, Joseph Wayne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilliland, Joseph Wayne, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-81,473-01

EX PARTE JOSEPH WAYNE GILLILAND, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1413241-A IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

marihuana and sentenced to six months’ imprisonment in a state jail facility. He did not appeal his

conviction.

Applicant contends that post conviction testing of the substances reveal that he possessed less

than four ounces of marihuana, and that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction for

a felony. He also argues that the new test results prove he is actually innocent. The State and trial 2

court agree that there is “no evidence” to support the judgment, and Applicant that is entitled to

relief.

We agree. Applicant is entitled to habeas relief, but he has not carried his burden to prove

he is actually innocent. The “actual innocence” term applies in Texas cases “only in circumstances

in which an accused did not, in fact, commit the charged offense or any of the lesser-included

offenses.” State v. Wilson, 324 S.W.3d 595, 598 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Here, Applicant has proven

he should not have been convicted of the greater offense of state jail felony possession of marihuana

to which he pleaded. But he has also proven that he is guilty of the lesser-included offense of

misdemeanor possession of marihuana. Though he is not “actually innocent,” Applicant is entitled

to relief. State v. Wilson, 324 S.W.3d 595 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 141324101010 in the 182nd District Court of

Harris County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County

to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: February 25, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wilson
324 S.W.3d 595 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gilliland, Joseph Wayne, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilliland-joseph-wayne-texcrimapp-2015.