Gillighan v. Tebbetts
This text of 33 Me. 360 (Gillighan v. Tebbetts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a suit upon an assigned claim, brought in the name of the assignor for the benefit of the'assignee, it is not the right of the defendant to prove declarations, made by the assignor subsequently to the assignment.
If, after the dissolution of a copartnership, one of the copartners have assigned to the other his interest in a copartnership claim against the defendant, it is not the right of the defendant, (in a suit upon such claim brought in the name of both copartners for the benefit of the assignee,) to prove declarations, made by the assignor subsequently to the assignment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 Me. 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillighan-v-tebbetts-me-1851.