Gillighan v. Tebbetts

33 Me. 360
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1851·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In a suit upon an assigned claim, brought in the name of the assignor for the benefit of the'assignee, it is not the right of the defendant to prove declarations, made by the assignor subsequently to the assignment.

If, after the dissolution of a copartnership, one of the copartners have assigned to the other his interest in a copartnership claim against the defendant, it is not the right of the defendant, (in a suit upon such claim brought in the name of both copartners for the benefit of the assignee,) to prove declarations, made by the assignor subsequently to the assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillighan v. Tebbetts, 33 Me. 360 (Me. 1851).

33 Me. 360 (Gillighan v. Tebbetts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roach v. Halvorson
148 N.W. 1080 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)