Gilligan v. Lepone

31 A.D.2d 630, 295 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2792
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 2, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 31 A.D.2d 630 (Gilligan v. Lepone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gilligan v. Lepone, 31 A.D.2d 630, 295 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Appeal by defendants, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 29, 1968, as, on reargument, denied their original motion for discovery and inspection of plaintiff’s Federal income tax returns for the years 1964, 1965 and 1966. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. If plaintiff filed such tax returns for the years in question, she is herewith directed within 10 days after entry of the order hereon to furnish to defendants’ attorney a true copy of each such return or, if she does not have such copies, an appropriate authorization to the United States Internal Revenue Service to transmit to defendants’ attorney a certified copy of each such return, defendants to pay the expenses involved in procuring the certified copies. If plaintiff has not filed such tax returns for said years, she is herewith directed within the same 10-day period to furnish to defendants’ attorney an affidavit stating such fact. In a negligence action where a self-employed plaintiff claims loss of earnings as a result of the accident, a defendant is entitled to discovery and inspection of the plaintiff’s income tax returns (Katz v. Memoli, 28 A D 2d 1128; Neuberger v. Vega, 30 A D 2d 779; Coleman v. Myers, 29 A D 2d 727). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scholte v. Agway, Inc.
152 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Burch v. Gould
149 A.D.2d 784 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Bauer v. Huber
127 Misc. 2d 672 (New York Supreme Court, 1985)
Lane v. D'Angelos
108 A.D.2d 727 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
9 H Realty Corp. v. Zurich Insurance
72 A.D.2d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Rashkind v. City School District
100 Misc. 2d 117 (New York Supreme Court, 1979)
Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Friedman
55 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Krauss v. Putterman
50 A.D.2d 599 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)
Ortiz v. Mary Immaculate Hospital
48 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 A.D.2d 630, 295 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilligan-v-lepone-nyappdiv-1968.