Gillies v. Orienta Beach Club & Orienta Realty Corp.
This text of 248 A.D. 623 (Gillies v. Orienta Beach Club & Orienta Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action brought to restrain the defendants from interfering with alleged rights of plaintiffs, based entirely upon the asserted right of custom, order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action and judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are in accord with the decision made at the Special Term and agree with the conclusion there reached that the right of custom contended for by the plaintiffs does not exist in the State of New York and that, even if it did, the right claimed by the plaintiffs, in this action, is beyond the scope of the right of custom recognized by the English law, and, furthermore, that the user alleged in the complaint is for a time insufficient to establish the right of custom as recognized by the English law.. Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., concurs on the ground that easement by custom does not here exist. [159 Misc. 675.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 A.D. 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillies-v-orienta-beach-club-orienta-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1936.