Gilliam v. Shellman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 9, 2002
• Docket: 02-7040
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7040

PHILLIP A. GILLIAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATE SHELLMAN, Parole Officer; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-02-105-3)

Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 9, 2002

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip A. Gilliam, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Phillip A. Gilliam appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint

for failure to pay a partial filing fee. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Gilliam v. Shellman, No. CA-02-105-3 (E.D. Va. June 21,

2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED