Gilliam v. Marshall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gilliam v. Marshall

873 S.W.2d 671, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 605, 1994 WL 120145

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 12, 1994·No. No. 63440·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gilliam appeals the trial court’s order denying her breach of contract claim against Marshall and granting Marshall’s counterclaim against her for $5,134.53. We affirm.

We find the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). We further find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential value; therefore we affirm by written order. A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gilliam appeals the trial court’s order denying her breach of contract claim against Marshall and granting Marshall’s counterclaim against her for $5,134.53. We affirm.

We find the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). We further find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential value; therefore we affirm by written order. A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Gilliam v. Marshall, 873 S.W.2d 671, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 605, 1994 WL 120145 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

873 S.W.2d 671 (Gilliam v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.