Gilliam v. American Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Gilliam v. American Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.

305 S.W.2d 524

DecidedSeptember 27, 1957

StatusPublished

This text of 305 S.W.2d 524 (Gilliam v. American Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilliam v. American Farmers Mutual Insurance Co., 305 S.W.2d 524 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that the appellant could not collect under a theft provision of an insurance policy issued by the ap-pellee on a car because he failed to show ownership of the car. The amount in controversy was under $2,500 but over $200. We are affirming the judgment because we think the finding of the trial court was correct.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court held that the appellant could not collect under a theft provision of an insurance policy issued by the ap-pellee on a car because he failed to show ownership of the car. The amount in controversy was under $2,500 but over $200. We are affirming the judgment because we think the finding of the trial court was correct.

The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

305 S.W.2d 524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilliam-v-american-farmers-mutual-insurance-co-kyctapp-1957.