Gilliam v. American Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.
305 S.W.2d 524
Opinion
The trial court held that the appellant could not collect under a theft provision of an insurance policy issued by the ap-pellee on a car because he failed to show ownership of the car. The amount in controversy was under $2,500 but over $200. We are affirming the judgment because we think the finding of the trial court was correct.
The motion for an appeal is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gilliam v. American Farmers Mutual Insurance Co., 305 S.W.2d 524 (Ky. Ct. App. 1957).
305 S.W.2d 524 (Gilliam v. American Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.