GILLIAM, SHERRY v. ISABEL TAYLOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST

2025 TN WC 63
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedOctober 1, 2025
Docket2024-20-6739
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 TN WC 63 (GILLIAM, SHERRY v. ISABEL TAYLOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
GILLIAM, SHERRY v. ISABEL TAYLOR IRREVOCABLE TRUST, 2025 TN WC 63 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2025).

Opinion

FILED Oct 01, 2025 11:14 AM(CT) TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT GRAY

SHERRY GILLIAM, ) Docket No. 2024-20-6739 Employee, ) v. ) ISABEL TAYLOR IRREVOCABLE ) State File No. 66002-2024 TRUST, ) Employer, ) And ) Judge Brian K. Addington TECHNOLOGY INS. CO., ) Carrier. )

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER

The Court held an expedited hearing on September 16, 2025, to determine if Ms. Gilliam is entitled to benefits. Isabel Taylor Irrevocable Trust denied the claim, asserting the alleged injury was idiopathic and that her symptoms were related to a preexisting or post-accident injury. For the reasons below, the Court holds Ms. Gilliam is not entitled to the requested benefits.

Claim History

Isabel Taylor Irrevocable Trust was created to provide long-term care for Sam Taylor, who was permanently bedridden and has since passed away. Ms. Gilliam worked as his overnight caregiver.

On September 1, 2024, Ms. Gilliam was attending to Mr. Taylor when she alleged that she injured her right knee. She testified that she tripped on an electrical cord but stopped the fall by grabbing a folding door that opened to the bathroom area. Ms. Gilliam introduced a video of the event, which shows her walking out of the camera’s view, but her reflection can be seen in a mirror. The reflection is not entirely clear, but it does capture Ms. Gilliam walking into doors, followed by a crashing noise and Ms. Gilliam bending down while using foul language. She then briefly returned within camera range and hobbled away.

1 She reported the injury to Mr. Taylor’s daughter, Tiffany Owens, the next morning. A few days later Ms. Gilliam received authorized treatment from an orthopedic urgent-care clinic. There she reported she tripped on a cord and fell into a door but did not hit her knee or leg. She also gave a history of a right-knee injury from a motor vehicle accident and resulting hematoma. The nurse reviewed the x-ray, diagnosed a strain, gave her a knee brace, and assigned sedentary restrictions. Ms. Gilliam was scheduled to return two weeks later.

The Trust denied her claim before the next appointment. Ms. Gilliam testified that the Trust was unable to offer work to accommodate her restrictions and terminated her.

On September 27, Ms. Gilliam went to the emergency room due to a fall at home. She reported she fell when her knee gave out as she tried to stand. She estimated she was unconscious for four hours from the fall. The records noted worsening right-knee pain and bleeding lacerations on her lower right leg. She was told to follow up with the orthopedic clinic.

In October, Ms. Gilliam went to another urgent-care clinic for knee pain. During that appointment, she attributed the pain to the fall at work and reported right-knee swelling and hematoma. The medical records also discussed two lesions on her right shin.

Ms. Gilliams’s testimony was hard to follow. She was able to state with certainty that she did not fall at work, but she often contradicted previous hearing and deposition testimony. She vacillated on whether she cut her leg during the incident at work and what, if anything, she fell over. She was unable to state exactly what happened.

Ms. Gilliam also gave conflicting testimony as to what she did after the alleged incident, stating that she cried all night in the bathroom or in the alternative, in a bedroom or her car. She testified that she has not been able to work since the incident.

Ms. Owens testified that she hired Ms. Gilliam as a caregiver for her father.1 Ms. Gilliam texted her stating she had fallen, but when Ms. Owens arrived at her father’s house, she was focused on making sure he was okay and did not notice where the cords lay. She later fired Ms. Gilliam because she was late for work. She did not recall any cords being located where Ms. Gilliam stated she tripped.

Becky Lowe, another Trust employee, testified that she and Ms. Gilliam had a conversation the morning of the alleged event. A video of that conversation shows that Ms.

1 The Trust did not provide any proof as to the relationship between it and Ms. Owens. The Court cannot determine whether Ms. Owens has the authority to speak on behalf of the Trust, although the testimony suggests she hired and fired Ms. Gilliam.

2 Gilliam said she had hurt her leg years before in a car wreck, that her knee popped during the alleged accident in question, and that she did not fall but ran into the door and caught herself. Ms. Lowe also testified that she did not observe cords running down the side of the bed where Ms. Gilliam stated they were.

Ms. Gilliam explained that she hid the truth about the cause of the incident from Ms. Lowe because Ms. Owen did not want her to discuss incidents at work. She argued that she was entitled to additional medical treatment for her leg, which was still swollen and continually bothers her. She requested temporary disability benefits because she has been unable to work.

The Trust argued that Ms. Gilliam did not prove that a hazard at work caused her injury. It asserted that she suffered an idiopathic injury and was not entitled to benefits.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Ms. Gilliam must show that she is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits. Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2024). She must show the injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment. Id. § 50-6-102(12).

An idiopathic injury is one that has an unexplained origin or cause and generally does not arise out of the employment unless “some condition of the employment presents a peculiar or additional hazard.” McCaffery v. Cardinal Logistics, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 50, at *9 (Dec. 10, 2015). An idiopathic injury is compensable “if an employment hazard causes or exacerbates the injury.” Id. at *10.

The Court heard all the witness testimony and observed the videos of the incident and Ms. Gilliam’s conversation with Ms. Lowe. The video of the accident does not show Ms. Lowe tripping but walking into the doors. Further, Ms. Gilliam could not identify the cord she tripped on. She simply does not know or remember.

Further, the video with Ms. Gilliam and Ms. Lowe shows that Ms. Gilliam blamed a previous car accident and said that her knee popped, causing her to run into the door. The Court does not find her explanation for her conflicting descriptions of the incident credible.

Based on the evidence presented at this time, the Court finds that Ms. Gilliam’s knee popped for an unexplained reason, and she ran into the door. She did not prove that she tripped over a hazard on the floor. Thus, the Court holds that she is unlikely to prove the injury arose primarily out of and in the course and scope of her employment.

IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. Ms. Gilliam’s request for benefits is denied.

3 2. The Court sets a status hearing for December 18, 2025, at 10:30 a.m. Eastern. The parties must call 855-543-5044 to participate. Failure to call may result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED October 1, 2025.

Brian K. Addington ______________________________________ BRIAN K. ADDINGTON, JUDGE Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims

Appendix Exhibits:

1. Affidavit of Sherry Gilliam 2. Text messages 3. Medical records-Appalachian Orthopaedic Associates 4. Deposition of Sherry Gilliam 5. (Collective) Photos A-H 6. (Collective) Criminal Judgments 7. Medical records- Johnson City Orthopedic Urgent Care 8. Medical records- Morristown Hamblen Healthcare System 9. Medical records- Radiology reports 10. Videos

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-239
Tennessee § 50-6-239(d)(1)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 TN WC 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilliam-sherry-v-isabel-taylor-irrevocable-trust-tennworkcompcl-2025.