Gillett v. Vincent

New York Supreme Court

Gillett v. Vincent

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110

DecidedApril 15, 1880

StatusPublished

This text of 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110 (Gillett v. Vincent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gillett v. Vincent, 28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered in the Wayne County Court, costs to abide event. Held, that the bond and mortgage were collateral to the contract, and the attempt to sever them from the contract and assign them separately was inoperative, and the plaintiff acquired no title to them. (Merritt v. Batholick, 36 N. Y., 44; Wanzer v. Cary, 76 N. Y., 526; Raynor v. Raynor, decided in this Department, at the present term, MS. Op. of Smith, J.) _

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered in the Wayne County Court, costs to abide event. Held, that the bond and mortgage were collateral to the contract, and the attempt to sever them from the contract and assign them separately was inoperative, and the plaintiff acquired no title to them. (Merritt v. Batholick, 36 N. Y., 44; Wanzer v. Cary, 76 N. Y., 526; Raynor v. Raynor, decided in this Department, at the present term, MS. Op. of Smith, J.) _

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillett-v-vincent-nysupct-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack