Gillett v. Foreman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Gillett v. Foreman

11 Iowa 512

CourtSupreme Court of Iowa

DecidedApril 16, 1861

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 Iowa 512 (Gillett v. Foreman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gillett v. Foreman, 11 Iowa 512 (iowa 1861).

Pincite

Opinion

Baldwin, J.

There is no special finding by the court to-which this cause was submitted and exceptions thereto, nor a motion for a new trial. The record presents the evidence, and the fact that upon this evidence the court found for the plaintiff. The judgment must be affirmed as falling within the rule laid down by this court in Pace v. Warner, 10 Iowa 891. But if not clearly within that rule, then upon the evidence, even if correctly admitted by the court, we are unable to say that the finding is so contrary to the weight of evidence as would justify the reversal of the judgment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baldwin, J.

There is no special finding by the court to-which this cause was submitted and exceptions thereto, nor a motion for a new trial. The record presents the evidence, and the fact that upon this evidence the court found for the plaintiff. The judgment must be affirmed as falling within the rule laid down by this court in Pace v. Warner, 10 Iowa 891. But if not clearly within that rule, then upon the evidence, even if correctly admitted by the court, we are unable to say that the finding is so contrary to the weight of evidence as would justify the reversal of the judgment.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Iowa 512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillett-v-foreman-iowa-1861.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack