Gillespie v. Winn

4 P. 411, 65 Cal. 429, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 584
California Supreme Court·Decided July 24, 1884·No. No. 9,328·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

The Court.

We think the motion for nonsuit was properly granted. The claim on which the action is based was never presented for allowance to the defendant as the administrator of the estate of Mrs. Hersperger, deceased, nor is it shown that the money which she received as the guardian of plaintiff ever came into the hands of defendant as such administrator, or otherwise. On the other hand, the only evidence introduced on the trial tends to prove the exact reverse.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillespie v. Winn, 4 P. 411, 65 Cal. 429, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 584 (Cal. 1884).

4 P. 411 (Gillespie v. Winn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holland v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n
1 P.2d 1031 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Newbery v. Wilkinson
190 F. 62 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington, 1911)