Gillespie v. Wilder

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Gillespie v. Wilder

99 Mass. 170

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 15, 1868

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 99 Mass. 170 (Gillespie v. Wilder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gillespie v. Wilder, 99 Mass. 170 (Mass. 1868).

Pincite

Opinion

Colt, J.

This action is to recover commissions for nego[172]*172tiating and selling certain shares of stock in a corporation. The whole evidence produced negatives any sale of the stock by the plaintiff. The sale was actually effected by the defendant in the absence of the plaintiff. The services rendered for the defendant were not those stated in the declaration. If of any value to the defendant, and rendered at his request, upon promise of compensation, express or implied, they may be recovered for under a count properly framed. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Colt, J.

This action is to recover commissions for nego[172]*172tiating and selling certain shares of stock in a corporation. The whole evidence produced negatives any sale of the stock by the plaintiff. The sale was actually effected by the defendant in the absence of the plaintiff. The services rendered for the defendant were not those stated in the declaration. If of any value to the defendant, and rendered at his request, upon promise of compensation, express or implied, they may be recovered for under a count properly framed. Exceptions overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 Mass. 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillespie-v-wilder-mass-1868.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack