Gillespie v. Wilder

99 Mass. 170
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 15, 1868·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Colt, J.

This action is to recover commissions for nego[172]*172tiating and selling certain shares of stock in a corporation. The whole evidence produced negatives any sale of the stock by the plaintiff. The sale was actually effected by the defendant in the absence of the plaintiff. The services rendered for the defendant were not those stated in the declaration. If of any value to the defendant, and rendered at his request, upon promise of compensation, express or implied, they may be recovered for under a count properly framed. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillespie v. Wilder, 99 Mass. 170 (Mass. 1868).

99 Mass. 170 (Gillespie v. Wilder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dowling v. Morrill
43 N.E. 295 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Mears v. Stone
44 Ill. App. 444 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1892)
Hyams v. Miller
71 Ga. 608 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1883)