Gillespie v. Sears, Roebuck
This text of 386 F.3d 21 (Gillespie v. Sears, Roebuck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 03-2087
JAMES GILLESPIE and DEBORAH GILLESPIE,
Plaintiffs, Appellees,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY and EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY,
Defendants, Appellants.
ERRATA
The opinion of this Court, issued on October 6, 2004, should
be amended as follows.
On page 3, line 8 of first paragraph, replace "labeling" with
"warning".
On page 6, line 6 of footnote 2, replace "standards" with
"standard".
On page 12, line 1 of second paragraph, delete "also".
On page 15, footnote 6, replace lines 2-3 after the word
"2000)", with the following:
(requiring an affirmative showing that the jury "probably was confused: by being instructed on a claim or.
On page 19, line 7 of footnote 9, insert a space before "and".
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
386 F.3d 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillespie-v-sears-roebuck-ca1-2006.