Gillespie v. Sears, Roebuck

386 F.3d 21
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 9, 2006·No. 03-2087·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 03-2087

JAMES GILLESPIE and DEBORAH GILLESPIE,

Plaintiffs, Appellees,

v.

SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY and EMERSON ELECTRIC COMPANY,

Defendants, Appellants.

ERRATA

The opinion of this Court, issued on October 6, 2004, should

be amended as follows.

On page 3, line 8 of first paragraph, replace "labeling" with

"warning".

On page 6, line 6 of footnote 2, replace "standards" with

"standard".

On page 12, line 1 of second paragraph, delete "also".

On page 15, footnote 6, replace lines 2-3 after the word

"2000)", with the following:

(requiring an affirmative showing that the jury "probably was confused: by being instructed on a claim or.

On page 19, line 7 of footnote 9, insert a space before "and".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillespie v. Sears, Roebuck, 386 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2006).

386 F.3d 21 (Gillespie v. Sears, Roebuck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melendez-Garcia v. Sanchez
629 F.3d 25 (First Circuit, 2010)
Soto-Lebron v. Federal Express Corp.
538 F.3d 45 (First Circuit, 2008)
Taylor v. American Chemistry Council
576 F.3d 16 (First Circuit, 2009)
Gemini Investors Inc. v. AmeriPark, Inc.
643 F.3d 43 (First Circuit, 2011)