Gillespie v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
235 N.E.2d 911, 21 N.Y.2d 823, 288 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1620
Opinion
Order modified, with costs to respondents, to the extent of adding the post-verdict interest which was inadvertently stricken and, as so modified, affirmed. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Keating, Breitel and Jasen.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gillespie v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 235 N.E.2d 911, 21 N.Y.2d 823, 288 N.Y.S.2d 907, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1620 (N.Y. 1968).
235 N.E.2d 911 (Gillespie v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Culpepper v. Allstate Insurance
31 A.D.3d 490 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Frances Schwimmer v. Allstate Insurance Company
176 F.3d 648 (Second Circuit, 1999)
Alkinburgh v. Glessing
240 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In Re Joint Eastern & Southern Districts Asbestos Litigation
798 F. Supp. 940 (S.D. New York, 1992)
In Re BROOKLYN NAVY YARD ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
971 F.2d 831 (Second Circuit, 1992)
State Division of Human Rights v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
90 A.D.2d 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Mount Sinai Hospital v. Borg-Warner Corp.
527 F. Supp. 922 (S.D. New York, 1981)