Gillespie v. Gillespie

129 A. 922, 98 N.J. Eq. 414, 13 Stock. 414, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 610
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gillespie v. Gillespie. Read the opinion of the Court — 98 N.J. Eq. 413
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 18, 1925·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenci-iard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillespie v. Gillespie, 129 A. 922, 98 N.J. Eq. 414, 13 Stock. 414, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 610 (N.J. 1925).

129 A. 922 (Gillespie v. Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.