Gillespie v. Gillespie

656 So. 2d 189, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5051, 1995 WL 270572
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1995·No. No. 94-01853·Published

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

The husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. He contests, among other things, the wording of the final judgment as it pertains to the equitable distribution of his pension plan. We construe the final judgment to conform with our holding in Trant v. Trant, 545 So.2d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 551 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1989), that the wife is not entitled to the [190]*190increased value of the pension fund after the date of dissolution.

Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and LAZZARA, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillespie v. Gillespie, 656 So. 2d 189, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5051, 1995 WL 270572 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

656 So. 2d 189 (Gillespie v. Gillespie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trant v. Trant
545 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)