Gillespie v. Gillespie
This text of 656 So. 2d 189 (Gillespie v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The husband appeals from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. He contests, among other things, the wording of the final judgment as it pertains to the equitable distribution of his pension plan. We construe the final judgment to conform with our holding in Trant v. Trant, 545 So.2d 428 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 551 So.2d 464 (Fla. 1989), that the wife is not entitled to the [190]*190increased value of the pension fund after the date of dissolution.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
656 So. 2d 189, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5051, 1995 WL 270572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillespie-v-gillespie-fladistctapp-1995.