Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION LEIGH ANN GILLESPIE, ) Plaintiff, Vv. Civ. No. 3:23-cv-00198-FDW-SCR COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) Defendant. ORDER THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Consent Motion to Remand, (Doc. No. 9). For the reasons stated in the motion, itis GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant’s decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant’s motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this case for further administrative proceedings, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings. See Melkonyan vy. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993). IT IS SO ORDERED.
Signed: October 18, 2023
Frank D. Whitney United States District Judge * ey
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security (Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.