Gilles v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Gilles v. State

176 N.W.2d 123, 286 Minn. 548, 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1270

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMarch 26, 1970

DocketNo. 42156

StatusPublished

This text of 176 N.W.2d 123 (Gilles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilles v. State, 176 N.W.2d 123, 286 Minn. 548, 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1270 (Mich. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant’s motion that he be represented by a private attorney and not by a member of the staff of the Office of the Public Defender in postconviction proceedings. The order is not appealable as of right. Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, Rule 103.03. In postconviction proceedings “[a]n appeal may be taken to the Minnesota supreme court from the order granting relief or denying the petition within 60 days after the entry of the said order.” Minn. St. 590.06.

In view of the fact that the services of the state public defender’s office are available to petitioner if he elects to use them (see, State v. Gilles, 279 Minn. 363, 157 N. W. [2d] 64), our intervention in the case at this time would be inappropriate.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying appellant’s motion that he be represented by a private attorney and not by a member of the staff of the Office of the Public Defender in postconviction proceedings. The order is not appealable as of right. Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, Rule 103.03. In postconviction proceedings “[a]n appeal may be taken to the Minnesota supreme court from the order granting relief or denying the petition within 60 days after the entry of the said order.” Minn. St. 590.06.

In view of the fact that the services of the state public defender’s office are available to petitioner if he elects to use them (see, State v. Gilles, 279 Minn. 363, 157 N. W. [2d] 64), our intervention in the case at this time would be inappropriate.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 N.W.2d 123, 286 Minn. 548, 1970 Minn. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilles-v-state-minn-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack