Gilleran v. Springfield, L. I.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gilleran v. Springfield, L. I.

174 A.D. 885, 159 N.Y.S. 1115

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 174 A.D. 885 (Gilleran v. Springfield, L. I.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gilleran v. Springfield, L. I., 174 A.D. 885, 159 N.Y.S. 1115 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after entry of the order of this court, on payment of the costs specified at Special Term. Inasmuch as the facts set forth in the second cause of action attempt to state a joint cause of action in favor of the plaintiff and Jaffe, andas Jaffeisnot a party to this action, this court does not pass upon the sufficiency of the facts therein pleaded as constituting a cause of action, and the order below is affirmed, without prejudice to such determination as may be made as to the joint cause of action when the proper parties are before the court. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within ten days after entry of the order of this court, on payment of the costs specified at Special Term. Inasmuch as the facts set forth in the second cause of action attempt to state a joint cause of action in favor of the plaintiff and Jaffe, andas Jaffeisnot a party to this action, this court does not pass upon the sufficiency of the facts therein pleaded as constituting a cause of action, and the order below is affirmed, without prejudice to such determination as may be made as to the joint cause of action when the proper parties are before the court. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 A.D. 885, 159 N.Y.S. 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gilleran-v-springfield-l-i-nyappdiv-1916.