Gillenwater v. Cikutovich

567 F. App'x 193
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 21, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7783
StatusPublished

This text of 567 F. App'x 193 (Gillenwater v. Cikutovich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gillenwater v. Cikutovich, 567 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Gillenwater appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Gillenwater v. Cikutovich, No. 5:13—ct—03135-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 23, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillenwater-v-cikutovich-ca4-2014.