Gillen v. Public Service Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Gillen v. Public Service Railway Co.

116 A. 621, 97 N.J.L. 333, 12 Gummere 333, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 202

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1922·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. IVe desire to say in passing that the Supreme Court’s decision is strengthened by the opinion of this court in Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, [334]*33496 N. J. L. 184, which was decided after the filing of the Supreme Court’s opinion, and was therefore not before the judges at the time of their decision.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzen-BACH, ÜEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER, AcKERSON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — White, Van Buskirk, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Supreme Court. IVe desire to say in passing that the Supreme Court’s decision is strengthened by the opinion of this court in Hackensack Water Co. v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners, [334]*33496 N. J. L. 184, which was decided after the filing of the Supreme Court’s opinion, and was therefore not before the judges at the time of their decision.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Tren chard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzen-BACH, ÜEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER, AcKERSON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — White, Van Buskirk, JJ. 2.

Gillen v. Public Service Railway Co., 116 A. 621, 97 N.J.L. 333, 12 Gummere 333, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1922).

Pincite

116 A. 621 (Gillen v. Public Service Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.