Gillen v. Giordano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gillen v. Giordano

297 A.D.2d 678, 747 N.Y.2d 186

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 16, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 297 A.D.2d 678 (Gillen v. Giordano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gillen v. Giordano, 297 A.D.2d 678, 747 N.Y.2d 186 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

[679]*679Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the redemption of the subject property by the defendant Pabco Realty Corp. was valid (see RPTL former 1456 [1]). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly struck the appellant’s request for punitive damages against the Village defendants (see Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. R.R. Co., 70 NY2d 382, 386; Sharapata v Town of Islip, 56 NY2d 332).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[679]*679Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the redemption of the subject property by the defendant Pabco Realty Corp. was valid (see RPTL former 1456 [1]). Moreover, the Supreme Court properly struck the appellant’s request for punitive damages against the Village defendants (see Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. R.R. Co., 70 NY2d 382, 386; Sharapata v Town of Islip, 56 NY2d 332).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and Adams, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

297 A.D.2d 678, 747 N.Y.2d 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillen-v-giordano-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack