Gillard v. Maly

106 A.D.3d 1347, 965 N.Y.S.2d 391
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination Ending him guilty of creating a disturbance. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Santiago v Fischer, 101 AD3d 1206, 1206 [2012]; Matter of Sykes v Fischer, 98 AD3d 769, 770 [2012]). Petitioner’s request in his reply brief for, among other things, lost wages and copying costs is denied (see Matter of Harrison v Brooks, 32 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2006]).

Rose, J.P, Lahtinen, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gillard v. Maly, 106 A.D.3d 1347, 965 N.Y.S.2d 391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

106 A.D.3d 1347 (Gillard v. Maly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Maye v. Venettozzi
2018 NY Slip Op 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Matter of Shapard v. Annucci
137 A.D.3d 1398 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)