Gillard v. Maly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gillard v. Maly

106 A.D.3d 1347, 965 N.Y.S.2d 391

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 2013

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.D.3d 1347 (Gillard v. Maly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gillard v. Maly, 106 A.D.3d 1347, 965 N.Y.S.2d 391 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination Ending him guilty of creating a disturbance. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Santiago v Fischer, 101 AD3d 1206, 1206 [2012]; Matter of Sykes v Fischer, 98 AD3d 769, 770 [2012]). Petitioner’s request in his reply brief for, among other things, lost wages and copying costs is denied (see Matter of Harrison v Brooks, 32 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2006]).

Rose, J.P, Lahtinen, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of Shawangunk Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier II disciplinary determination Ending him guilty of creating a disturbance. The Attorney General has informed this Court that, during the pendency of this proceeding, the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory surcharge has been refunded to his inmate account. Inasmuch as petitioner has received all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Santiago v Fischer, 101 AD3d 1206, 1206 [2012]; Matter of Sykes v Fischer, 98 AD3d 769, 770 [2012]). Petitioner’s request in his reply brief for, among other things, lost wages and copying costs is denied (see Matter of Harrison v Brooks, 32 AD3d 1087, 1088 [2006]).

Rose, J.P, Lahtinen, Spain and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.D.3d 1347, 965 N.Y.S.2d 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillard-v-maly-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack