Gillard v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N

784 So. 2d 1214, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5049, 2001 WL 376524
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 17, 2001
Docket1D00-3702
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 784 So. 2d 1214 (Gillard v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gillard v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N, 784 So. 2d 1214, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5049, 2001 WL 376524 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

784 So.2d 1214 (2001)

Howard L. GILLARD, Petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.

No. 1D00-3702.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 17, 2001.
Rehearing Denied May 25, 2001.

*1215 Howard L. Gillard, Petitioner, pro se.

William L. Camper, General Counsel, Florida Parole Commission, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner, Howard L. Gillard, a prisoner incarcerated in Walton County, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the Circuit Court of Leon County in which he challenged the Florida Parole Commission's revocation of his conditional release. He claimed that the Commission lacked the authority to revoke after it waited more than 45 days to conduct the final revocation hearing. See sec. 947.141(2), Fla. Stat. (1991). The lower court denied the petition, and Petitioner filed a petition for writ of certiorari in this court. We grant the petition.

Because Petitioner claimed an entitlement to immediate release, the appropriate vehicle for raising the claim is a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the county in which he is currently incarcerated. See, e.g., Stanley v. Moore, 744 So.2d 1160 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Steele v. State, 733 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); sec. 79.09, Fla. Stat. (1999). Thus, because Petitioner was not incarcerated in Leon County, the Circuit Court of Leon County lacked territorial jurisdiction over this action. See Lewis v. Florida Parole Commission, 697 So.2d 965 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari, quash the order below, and remand with instructions to treat the action as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and immediately transfer the petition to the circuit court that has jurisdiction over the correctional facility in which Petitioner is currently incarcerated.

MINER, KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. McNeil
990 So. 2d 1222 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Spencer v. Florida Parole Commission
874 So. 2d 718 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Knowles v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
846 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Heard v. Florida Parole Commission
811 So. 2d 808 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Bauder v. Florida Parole Commission
808 So. 2d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Weed v. State
802 So. 2d 501 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
784 So. 2d 1214, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 5049, 2001 WL 376524, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gillard-v-florida-parole-comn-fladistctapp-2001.