Gill v. State

388 S.W.3d 598, 2012 WL 6598706, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 18, 2012·No. No. ED 98291·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jarrod L. Gill appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.0851 without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We [599] affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gill v. State, 388 S.W.3d 598, 2012 WL 6598706, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

388 S.W.3d 598 (Gill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nesbitt v. State
335 S.W.3d 67 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)