Gill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gill v. State

388 S.W.3d 598, 2012 WL 6598706, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 18, 2012

DocketNo. ED 98291

StatusPublished

This text of 388 S.W.3d 598 (Gill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gill v. State, 388 S.W.3d 598, 2012 WL 6598706, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jarrod L. Gill appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.085¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We [599]*599affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jarrod L. Gill appeals from the judgment denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.085¹ without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k); Nesbitt v. State, 335 S.W.3d 67, 69 (Mo.App. E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We [599]*599affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

388 S.W.3d 598, 2012 WL 6598706, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1605, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-state-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack