Gill v. State

815 So. 2d 714, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5214, 2002 WL 662928
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 24, 2002
DocketNo. 4D01-4638
StatusPublished

This text of 815 So. 2d 714 (Gill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gill v. State, 815 So. 2d 714, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5214, 2002 WL 662928 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s 3.850 post-conviction relief motion asserting a claim pursuant Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant to present the double jeopardy claim, raised for the first time on direct appeal, to the trial court for resolution. See Colon v. State, 738 So.2d 1023 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (conviction for one count of misdemeanor DUI reversed because a charge of misdemeanor DUI “is a lesser included offense of DUI with an accident,” which would allow a defendant to be sentenced twice for the same offense).

POLEN, C.J., STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Colon v. State
738 So. 2d 1023 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
815 So. 2d 714, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 5214, 2002 WL 662928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.