Gill v. State
771 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648, 2000 WL 1671454
Opinion
Mfirmed without prejudice to appellant-refiling a facially sufficient motion to correct sentence. See Capio v. State, 765 So.2d 853 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Smith v. State, 765 So.2d 308 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gill v. State, 771 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648, 2000 WL 1671454 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
771 So. 2d 582 (Gill v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. State
765 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Capio v. State
765 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)