Gill v. State
771 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648, 2000 WL 1671454
This text of 771 So. 2d 582 (Gill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gill v. State, 771 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648, 2000 WL 1671454 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
Mfirmed without prejudice to appellant-refiling a facially sufficient motion to correct sentence. See Capio v. State, 765 So.2d 853 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Smith v. State, 765 So.2d 308 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Smith v. State
765 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Capio v. State
765 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
771 So. 2d 582, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 14648, 2000 WL 1671454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.