Gill v. Parrish
168 F. 1020, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4533
This text of 168 F. 1020 (Gill v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gill v. Parrish, 168 F. 1020, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4533 (1st Cir. 1909).
Opinion
This case is affirmed, on.the authority of Gill v. Austin, 157 Fed. 234, 84 C. C. A. 677, and Kinney v. Conant (C. C. A.) 166 Fed. 720. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed, with interest.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gill v. Austin
157 F. 234 (First Circuit, 1907)
Kinney v. Conant
166 F. 720 (First Circuit, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 F. 1020, 93 C.C.A. 670, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-parrish-ca1-1909.