Gill v. Hackney
3 N.J.L. 921
Opinion
This would have been error, but it is cured by the late act respecting costs in justices’ courts. It is the original judgment that is before us, and not the one confessed by way of security.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gill v. Hackney, 3 N.J.L. 921 (N.J. 1812).
3 N.J.L. 921 (Gill v. Hackney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.