Gill v. Downs

Supreme Court of Alabama

Gill v. Downs

26 Ala. 670

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedJanuary 15, 1855

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 26 Ala. 670 (Gill v. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gill v. Downs, 26 Ala. 670 (Ala. 1855).

Pincite

Opinion

CHILTON, C. J.

—The only error assigned is, that the court refused the motion to quash the attachment. Such refusal cannot be questioned on error : neither is a motion to quash the remedy in such cases.—Jordan v. Hazard, 10 Ala. 221-6. But, if it were, the defendant waived it, by failing to make it at the first term of the court, and. by afterwards appearing and pleading to the merits.—Burroughs v. Wright, 3 Ala. 43.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHILTON, C. J.

—The only error assigned is, that the court refused the motion to quash the attachment. Such refusal cannot be questioned on error : neither is a motion to quash the remedy in such cases.—Jordan v. Hazard, 10 Ala. 221-6. But, if it were, the defendant waived it, by failing to make it at the first term of the court, and. by afterwards appearing and pleading to the merits.—Burroughs v. Wright, 3 Ala. 43.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Ala. 670, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-downs-ala-1855.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack