Gill v. Dc Metropolitan Police Department
This text of Gill v. Dc Metropolitan Police Department (Gill v. Dc Metropolitan Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED
UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT coURT m AFR 2 l 2011 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA e'k» U-S- oi$ffi¢f & Bankrup; Courts for the District of columbia
Andrew Gill, ) )
Plaintiff, )
)
v. ) Civil Action No.
The D.C. Metropolitan Police et al., ) )
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff sues "on behalf of Jane Doe l, 2, and 3," who he alleges were sexually assaulted "outside of the D.C. Public Library known as Northwest One Library." Complaint at l. In federal court, "parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally or by counsel." See 28 U.S.C. § l654. Plaintiff is not a licensed attorney, and he
cannot prosecute the claims of other individuals. Consequently, the case will be dismissed.'
nw
'United §tates District Judge
r)aze: April 20 , 2011
' A separate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gill v. Dc Metropolitan Police Department, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-dc-metropolitan-police-department-dcd-2011.