Gill v. Commissioner

1995 T.C. Memo. 328, 70 T.C.M. 120, 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 324
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedJuly 24, 1995
DocketDocket Nos. 13312-92, 13314-92
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1995 T.C. Memo. 328 (Gill v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gill v. Commissioner, 1995 T.C. Memo. 328, 70 T.C.M. 120, 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 324 (tax 1995).

Opinion

THEODORE J. AND JOAN D. GILL, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; RAYMOND C. AND MARLYS A. SCHLICHTING, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Gill v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 13312-92, 13314-92
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1995-328; 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 324; 70 T.C.M. (CCH) 120;
July 24, 1995, Filed

*324 Decisions will be entered for respondent.

For petitioners: Frank J. O'Connell, Jr.
For respondent: Jack Forsberg.
DINAN

DINAN

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DINAN, Special Trial Judge: These consolidated cases were heard pursuant to the provisions of section 7443A(b)(3) of the Code and Rules 180, 181, and 183. 1

Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income taxes as follows:

Docket No. 13312-92
YearDeficiency
1988$ 2,754
19891,196
19901,543
Docket No. 13314-92
YearDeficiency
1988$   211
1990379

The issue for decision is whether amounts received by petitioners from Jack Frost, Inc. were net earnings from self-employment subject to the self-employment tax.

For convenience we have combined our findings of fact and opinion with respect to the issue in these cases. Some of the facts have been stipulated. *325 The stipulations of fact and accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by this reference.

Petitioners resided in the State of Minnesota when they filed their petitions.

Jack Frost, Inc. (Jack Frost), a Minnesota corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JFC, Inc.JFC, Inc. and its subsidiaries produce, process, and market chicken products under the brand name "Gold'n Plump".

Jack Frost buys breeder stock (chicks) from primary breeders. They are placed in pullet raising buildings for 20 weeks. The pullets are then moved to breeder houses where the males and females are matched for the natural reproductive process of fertilizing the eggs. The fertilized eggs are then refrigerated and shipped to hatcheries where they are placed in incubators for 18 days. The eggs are next placed in trays where they hatch in about 3 days. Finally, the chicks are transported to broiler barns where it takes between 45-50 days for the broiler chickens to reach the desired size for processing and marketing.

Jack Frost contracts with farmers (growers) to raise the broiler chickens. During the years in issue, Jack Frost published and distributed a brochure entitled "A Partnership That Works". The*326 brochure provided, in part, as follows:

For years, Gold'n Plump Poultry, a leading local marketer of fresh chicken products, has been quietly joining forces with farmers in the area like yourself.

Gold'n Plump has made special arrangements with selected local farmers to grow high quality chickens you're used to purchasing in the supermarket meat case. Gold'n Plump provides all the training, expertise and advice.

It assists in the financial arrangements and construction of the special barns. It offers to its farmers incentive packages and bonuses.

The Gold'n Plump family of "Partners" invites your application to see if you qualify.

In doing so you will join a growing family of hundreds of profitable happy farmers who have secure, stable futures ahead of them.

Petitioners applied to become participants in the Gold'n Plump family of "Partners" and were accepted. In selecting potential growers, Jack Frost requires that they have adequate land on which to construct a broiler barn (barn) and the ability to maintain the facility; i.e., someone who is a handyman. They would also have to have the finances necessary to construct a barn and to carry any construction loan obtained to build*327 the facility.

Jack Frost provides the specifications for the construction of the barns. In that way, the barns are designed and constructed essentially the same. That affords Jack Frost the ability to predict with some accuracy the outcome of its barn production programs. The square footage of the barn is a determinant of the number of birds in each flock that can be raised in the barn.

Most of Jack Frost's barn owners have gone to their local financial institutions to obtain the financing necessary to construct their barns but Jack Frost actively participates in the financing by coordinating the lending activity between the financial institution and the barn owner. Typically, the barn owner assigned to the lender the amounts due under his agreement with Jack Frost as security for the loan. The payments were then made directly to the lender by Jack Frost. Both the Gills and the Schlichtings constructed barns on their farms with financing obtained by them with the assistance of Jack Frost.

Jack Frost enters into growing agreements and supplemental rental agreements with the barn owners, and those agreements with each owner are basically the same. The growing agreement is the base*328 agreement. Jack Frost has periodically adjusted the amount of the base payment to the growers under the growing agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McNamara v. Commissioner
1999 T.C. Memo. 333 (U.S. Tax Court, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1995 T.C. Memo. 328, 70 T.C.M. 120, 1995 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gill-v-commissioner-tax-1995.