Gill v. City of Kalamazoo
722 N.W.2d 834, 477 Mich. 916
Opinion
Rochelle GILL, Personal Representative of the Estate of John Gill, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF KALAMAZOO, Defendant, and
Stacey Geik, Defendant-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gill v. City of Kalamazoo, 722 N.W.2d 834, 477 Mich. 916 (Mich. 2006).
722 N.W.2d 834 (Gill v. City of Kalamazoo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.