Gill v. Ceases' Lunch System, Inc.

139 S.E. 925, 194 N.C. 803, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 238
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 26, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This was an action for the recovery of damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been caused by her eating unwholesome food negligently provided in the defendant’s cafeteria. At the close of the evidence the action was dismissed as in case of nonsuit. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of Lamb v. Boyles, 192 N. C., 542. See annotation in 49 A. L. R., 592.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gill v. Ceases' Lunch System, Inc., 139 S.E. 925, 194 N.C. 803, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 238 (N.C. 1927).

139 S.E. 925 (Gill v. Ceases' Lunch System, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perry v. Kelford Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
145 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)